<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>LAST TALKS AT SAANEN 1985 3RD PUBLIC TALK SUNDAY, 14TH JULY, 1985</TITLE>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="k.css"></HEAD><BODY>
<TABLE align=center border=0 width=450><TR><TD align=center height=80><br>
<FONT size=5 color=black><B>LAST TALKS AT SAANEN 1985 3RD PUBLIC TALK SUNDAY, 14TH JULY, 1985</B></FONT><br><br><br><DIV class='PP2'>May we continue with our conversation?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We were talking about conflict and the causation of conflict. Conflict is growing more and more in the world, in every form, in every social section.  We said that the cause of conflict is this constant opposition, not only within ourselves but also within the society in which we live.  Society is what we have made it.  I think that is fairly clear and obvious, because in ourselves we are, from the moment we are born till we die, in constant struggle, competition, conflict, with every form of destructive or positive attitudes, prejudices and opinions.  This has been the way of our life, not only at the present period but also probably for the last two and a half million years.  And we are still going on with this in the same pattern, the same mould - wars, more destructive than ever, division among nationalities, which is tribalism, religious divisions, family divisions, sectarian fragmentation and so on.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
If we may point out again this morning we are not here as an intellectual group, or a rather romantic, imaginative, sentimental assembly.  You and the speaker are going to take a journey together, not he leading you or you following him but together, side by side, perhaps holding hands if necessary. We are taking a journey, rather complex, twisting, subtle and perhaps endless, a journey that has no beginning and no end.  A journey as we understand it, has a beginning and an ending, something starts, goes on and then comes to an end, but perhaps it may not be at all like that.  It may be a constant movement, not within the cycle of time but rather outside the field of momentum as we know it.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
So we are together.  Please, the speaker must insist on this point.  You are not merely the listeners, accepting or rejecting what he says, but rather in co-operation, in responsibility, walking together in step, not one behind the other, along the same path, or lane.  So it is your responsibility as well as the speaker's not to accept or to deny, to agree or disagree.  We have been brought up, educated, in this system of agreeing and disagreeing.  We agree with some things, we disagree entirely with other things, so there is always this division - those who agree, do something together, and those who are opposed to what they are doing.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Could we this morning banish from our brains altogether, entirely out of our blood, the idea of agreeing or disagreeing?  Because if you agree with the speaker, and there are some who don't agree, then there is inevitably a conflict between the two.  One may tolerate it, one may put up with it, accept it, but there is always this division - clear?  So could we, seeing the consequences of agreeing and disagreeing, approving and disapproving, observe together, see together not only as far as we can what is happening externally - that is fairly simple because we are not told very much about what is actually going on in the political world, in the world of armaments, in the scientific world and all the technological worlds - but inwardly, subjectively, see exactly what is going on, not saying, `Well, this is bad, this is good.  I accept this, I don't accept that,' but just observe, not having in that observation any prejudice?  Can we do that?  Can we observe ourselves, our conduct, our behaviour, the way we think, our reactions, our faiths, beliefs, conclusions and so on?  Could we observe all that as it is, not as it should be, or as it must be, but just look at it?  That requires a great deal of attention, the brain must be extraordinarily active to reject any kind of reaction in watching oneself because, after all, what other people have said about us, the professors, the psychologists, the psychiatrists and the gurus is what they say; it is not what we see of ourselves.  I hope we are following each other.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
The words the speaker is using are very simple, words which we use daily in our conversation with each other.  There is no jargon, no specialized linguistic, semantic jargon.  We are talking things over together, as two friends using ordinary, daily language.  So we are asking: can we see exactly what we are without taking sides about it, not agreeing and disagreeing, seeing the consequences of each attitude, assessing, evaluating, judging, but just observing as you observe the sky of an evening full of stars, and those mountains, majestic against the blue sky?  Can we in the same way observe ourselves and our relationship to the world, and the world's relationship to us?  It is a rather complex process.  Are we together?  Or am I marching ahead and leaving you behind?  Could we go together, keeping in step? What are we?  Why have we such deep-rooted self-interest?  Not only self-interest outwardly - outwardly there is a certain necessity for self-interest otherwise one has to give up - but inwardly, psychologically, subjectively?  Why is there such deep, impenetrable self-interest in all of us?  Self-interest - you know what that word means?  To be interested in oneself, one's own profits, one's own failures, one's own fragmentation, one's own prejudices, opinions, the whole content of one's life.  Self-interest - why is it that we are so committed to that?  Is it possible to live in this world without that self-interest - first psychologically and then seeing if it is possible externally?  Are we together or am I talking over beyond that tent, over the fence?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Have you ever noticed that we build a fence round ourselves: a fence of self-protection, a fence to ward off any hurts, a barrier between you and the other, between you and the family, and so on? There is a barrier between you and the speaker.  Naturally.  You don't know the speaker, the speaker doesn't know you, therefore you are rather politely listening, curious as to what the devil he is talking about and hoping you will get something out of it after sitting an hour or so in this hot tent, expecting something, curious, choosing what suits you, what doesn't suit you, listening partially, not entirely because one doesn't want to expose oneself to oneself, so naturally one creates either a very, very thin barrier, hardly any, or a definite wall.  Why do we do that?  Is that not also self-interest?  And this self-interest must inevitably bring about fragmentation, to break up.  Nationally, you can see the barrier - on one side England and the other side all Europe, and beyond it.  There is this constant division, and where there is division there must be conflict, that is inevitable. Whether you have a very deep intimate relationship with your wife or husband, a girl or boy, and so on, where there is division there must be fragmentation, there must be conflict.  That is a law - right? Whether you like it or not that is a law.  But when one sees that, then the very seeing is the way of breaking down the barrier.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
So we must enquire: what does it mean to see?  What does it mean to observe?  I am observing myself - right?  I am watching what I am, my recreations, my prejudices, my convictions, my idiosyncrasies, the traditions in which I have been brought up, the reputation, all that rubbish.  I am watching.  If I do not watch very, very carefully, listen to every sound that is going on in watching, then I set a direction in which I must go.  You are following all this?  Am I talking to myself.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
We were talking in Washington, America, and they clapped what I said, approving, encouraging.  Here, you all sit very quietly.  One doesn't know whether you are really walking together with the speaker, actually listening, or casually coming to a Sunday morning sermon.  Instead of going to church you turn up here, either for amusement, or just to hear what that chap is saying, or, `Well I agree with him in some things but he is not quite right about other things.' We never look at the whole thing, the whole problem of life, the whole of existence from childhood to death.  We never take the whole thing in and observe, learn, not accumulate knowledge, that is fairly simple, but learn what is happening in ourselves, the demands that we make upon each other, the hurts, the deep loneliness, the depression, the anxiety, the uncertainty, the fears, and all the pleasant things that we have, and also the suffering, and ultimately the pain of death.  We never look at this whole movement as one, but rather we consider it fragmentarily.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Now we are going to look together if we may, not only at what is the cause of this fragmentation but also whether the brain, which has been conditioned for millions of years to war, to conflict, to work, work, work all the time, endlessly chattering, divided as nationalities and so on - your god and my god, Eastern philosophy opposed to Western philosophy - whether the brain can put aside altogether the whole movement of agreeing and disagreeing, in which there is choice.  I choose to go this way and you choose to go that way; I choose to believe in God, or no god, and you say, `No, sorry, I can't accept that, there must be God, because I believe it, I like it' - or `It is my tradition' - and so on.  If we once recognize the division, the agreement, the disagreement, reward and punishment, then we can begin to look actually at ourselves, because ourselves is the world.  What we are, the world is.  If we are violent, suspicious, ungenerous, the world is like that.  This is obvious because we have made this society, this monstrous, ugly, immoral world in which we live, with all the gods.  It has become a great circus, a painful circus, or a pleasurable circus.  So can we see exactly what we are without any distortion?  What are we - psychologically, not biologically?  Biologically we have been put together through millennia upon millennia.  Psychologically, from the beginning of man, there has been violence, hate, jealousy, aggression, trying always to become something more, more, more, and much more than what we are.  Is it that we are listening merely to the description or do we see the fact, not the idea of the fact?  You understand?  There is a difference between fact and the idea of the fact.  That is, we have an idea, see something and then pursue the idea: `I shouldn't be like this, I must be like that.' That is an idea.  When I see exactly what I am, that is a fact.  Fact does not need an idea, a concept, an ideology.  It is so.  I am angry.  That is a fact.  But if I say, `I must not be angry', then it becomes an idea.  Are we together in this?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
So what is it you are making out of this?  Is it that you are concluding a set of ideas, or are you seeing the fact as it is - that we are jealous, aggressive, lonely, fearful and all the rest of it? The whole psyche, the persona, the ego, is all that, and all that is the past, the memories we have collected - right?  I have been afraid, I know what fear is, and the moment that feeling arises I say, `That is fear.' That very saying `That it is fear' is an idea, not a fact.  I don't know if you are following all this?  Sir, the word tree is not the actual tree.  The name K is not the actual K. The word is not the thing.  So, when you observe, your brain is caught in a whole network of words, words, words.  Can you look at yourself without the word?  Oh, come on, sirs, play the game with me, will you?  The ball is in your court.  That is, can you look at your wife, at your husband, at your children, or your girl friend, or whatever it is, without the word?  Without the image?  That word, that image, is the division.  Can you look at the speaker without the word? - the word being all the remembrances about the speaker, the reputation, what you have read or not read, and so on, but just observe.  Which means one must grasp, understand, how the brain operates - your own brain, not the brain of philosophers, or the spiritual writers, or the priests or somebody or other.  just observe yourself without the word, then you can look at certain facts, why human beings get hurt.  That is very important to find out.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
From childhood we are hurt.  There is always the pressure, always the sense of being rewarded and punished.  You say something to me which I get angry about and that hurts me - right?  So we have realized a very simple fact that from childhood we are hurt, and for the rest of our life we carry that hurt - afraid of being hurt further, or attempting not to be hurt, which is another form of resistance.  So, are we aware of these hurts and of therefore creating a barrier round ourselves, the barrier of fear?  Can we go into this question of fear?  Shall we?  Not for my pleasure, for it is you I am talking about.  Can we go into it very, very deeply and see why human beings, which is all of us, have put up with fear for thousands of years?  We see the consequences of fear - fear of not being rewarded, fear of being a failure, fear of your weakness, fear of your own feeling that you must come to a certain point and not being able to.  Are you interested in going into this problem?  It means going into it completely to the very end, not just saying, `Sorry, that is too difficult.' Nothing is too difficult if you want to do it.  The word difficult prevents you from further action.  But if you can put away that word difficult then we can go into this very, very complex problem.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
First, why do we put up with it?  If you have a car which goes wrong you go to the nearest garage, if you can, and then the machinery is put right and you go on.  Is it that there is no one we can go to who will help us to have no fear - you understand the question?  Do we want help from somebody to be free of fear - from psychologists, psychotherapists, psychiatrists, or the priest, or the guru who says, `Surrender everything to me, including your money, then you will be perfectly all right'?  We do this.  You may laugh, you may be amused, but we are doing this all the time inwardly.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
So, do we want help?  Prayer is a form of help; asking to be free from fear is a form of help.  The speaker telling you how to be free of fear is a form of help.  But he is not going to tell you how, because we are walking together, we are giving energy to discover for ourselves the causation of fear.  If you see something very clearly, then you don't have to decide, or choose, or ask for help - you act - right?  Do we see clearly the whole structure, the inward nature of fear?  You have been afraid and the memory of it comes back and says that is fear.  You understand what I am saying?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
So let's go into this carefully - not the speaker going into it and then you agreeing, or disagreeing, but you yourself taking the journey with the speaker, not verbally or intellectually, but delving, probing, investigating.  We are finding out; we want to delve as you dig in the garden or to find water.  You dig deep, you don't stand outside on the earth and say, `I must have water.' You dig or go to the river.  So first of all, let's be very clear: do you want help in order to be free of fear?  If you want help then you are responsible for establishing an authority, a leader, a priest.  So one must ask oneself before we go into this question of fear, whether you want help.  Of course you go to a doctor if you have pain, or a headache, or some kind of disease. He knows much more about your organic nature so he tells you what to do.  We are not talking about that kind of help.  We are talking about whether you need help, somebody to instruct you, to lead you, and to say, `Do this, do that, day after day and you will be free of fear.' The speaker is not helping you.  That is one thing certain, because you have dozens of helpers, from the great religious leaders - God forbid! - to the lowest, the poor psychologist round the corner.  So let us be very clear between ourselves that the speaker doesn't want to help you in any way psychologically.  Would you kindly accept that?  Honestly accept it?  Don't say yes, it is very difficult.  In all your life you have sought help in various directions, though some say, `No, I don't want help.' It requires not only outward perception to see what the demand for help has done to humanity.  You ask help only when you are confused, when you don't know what to do, when you are uncertain.  But when you see things clearly - see, observe, perceive, not only externally, but much more inwardly - when you see things very, very clearly you don't want any help; there it is.  And from that comes action.  Are we together in this?  Let's repeat this if you don't mind.  The speaker is not telling you how.  Never ask that question how, for then there is always somebody giving you a rope.  The speaker is not helping you in any way, but together we are walking along the same road, perhaps not at the same speed.  Set your own speed and we will walk together.  Clear?  We are in accord?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
If you are not clear about demanding help you will have to go somewhere else.  Probably you will.  Or turn to a book, or turn to somebody, not towards the speaker.  Sorry to depress you and say I won't stretch out my hand; that is not it.  If we are walking together we are holding hands.  There is no stretching out your hand and seeking help.  Are we working together?  Or am I working and getting hot about it?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
What is the cause of fear?  Go slowly please.  Cause.  If you can discover the cause then you can do something about it, you can change the cause - right?  If a doctor tells me, tells the speaker, he has got cancer - which he hasn't - but suppose he tells me that I have got cancer and says, `I can remove it easily and you will be all right', I go to him.  He removes it and the cause comes to an end. So the cause can always be changed, rooted out.  If you have got a headache you can find the cause of it; you may be eating wrongly, or smoking or drinking too much.  Either you stop your drinking, smoking and all the rest, or you take a pill to stop it.  The pill then becomes the effect which stops for the moment the causation - right? So cause and effect can always be changed, immediately or you take time over it.  If you take time over it, then during that interval other factors enter into it.  So you never change the effect, you continue with the cause.  Are we together in this?  So what is the cause of fear?  Why haven't we gone into it?  Why do we tolerate it, knowing the effect of fear, the consequences of fear?  If you are not at all afraid psychologically, have no fear at all, you would have no gods, you would have no symbols to worship, no personalities to adore.  Then you are psychologically extraordinarily free.  Fear also makes one shrink, apprehensive, wanting to escape from it and therefore the escape becomes more important than the fear.  Are you following?  So we are going to go over it together to find out what is the cause of fear - the root cause of it.  And if we discover it for ourselves, then it is over.  If you see the causation, or many causes, then that very perception ends the cause.  Are you listening to me, the speaker, to explain the causation?  Or have you never even asked such a question?  I have borne fear, as has my father, my grandfather, the whole race in which I am born, the whole community; the whole structure of gods and rituals is based on fear and the desire to achieve some extraordinary state.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
So, let us go into this.  We are not talking about the various forms of fear - fear of darkness, fear of one's husband, wife, fear of society, fear of dying, etc.  It is like a tree that has got many, many branches, many flowers, many fruits, but we are talking about the very root of that tree.  The root of it - not your particular form of fear.  You can trace your particular form to the very root. So we are asking: are we concerned with our fears, or with the whole fear?  With the whole tree, not just one branch of it?  Because unless you understand how the tree lives, the water it requires, the depth of the soil and so on, merely trimming the branches won't do anything; we must go to the very root of fear. So what is the root of fear?  Don't wait for me to answer.  I am not your leader, I am not your helper, I am not your guru - thank God!  We are together, as two brothers, and I mean it, the speaker means it, it is not just words.  As two good friends who have known each other from the beginning of time, walking along the same path, at the same speed, looking at everything that is around you and in you, so together we will go into it.  Please, together.  Otherwise it becomes just words, and at the end of the talk you will say, `Really what am I to do with my fear?'
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Fear is very complex.  It is a tremendous reaction.  If you are aware of it, it is a shock, not only biologically, organically, but also a shock to the brain.  The brain has a capacity, as one discovers, not from what others say, to remain healthy in spite of a shock.  I don't know all about it, but the very shock invites its own protection.  If you go into it yourself, you will see.  So fear is a shock - momentarily, or continuing in different forms, with different expressions, in different ways.  So we are going to the very, very, very root of it.  To understand the very root of it, we must understand time - right?  Time as yesterday, time as today, time as tomorrow.  I remember something I have done, of which I am shy, or nervous, or apprehensive, or fearful; I remember all that and it continues to the future.  I have been angry, jealous, envious - that is the past.  I am still envious, slightly modified; I am fairly generous about things but envy goes on.  This whole process is time, isn't it?  You understand?  Say yes, for God's sake!  No, don't say yes!
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Let's begin again.  What do you consider is time?  By the clock, sunrise, sunset, the evening star, the new moon with the full moon coming a fortnight later?  What is time to you?  Time to learn a skill?  Time to learn a language?  Time to write a letter? Time to go to your house from here?  All that is time as distance - right?  I have to go from here to there.  That is a distance covered by time.  But time is also inward, psychological: I am this, I must become that.  Becoming that is called evolution.  Evolution means from the seed to the tree.  And also I am ignorant but I will learn. I don't know, but I will know.  Give me time to be free of violence. You are following all this?  Give me time.  Give me a few days, a month, or a year and I will be free of it.  So we live by time - not only going to the office every day from nine to five, God forbid, but also time to become something.  Look, you understand all this? Right?  Time, the movement of time?  I have been afraid of you and I remember that fear; that fear is still there and I will be afraid of you tomorrow.  I hope not, but if I don't do something very drastic about it I will be afraid of you tomorrow.  So we live by time. Please, let's be clear about this.  We live by time, which is, I am living, I will die.  I will postpone death as long as possible; I am living and I am going to do everything to avoid death though it is inevitable.  So psychologically as well as biologically we live by time.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Is time a factor of fear?  Please enquire.  Time - that is, I have told a lie, I don't want you to know, but you are very smart; you look at me and say, `You have told a lie.' `No, no, I have not' - I protect myself instantly because I am afraid of your finding out that I am a liar.  I am afraid because of something I have done, which I don't like you to know.  Which is what?  Thought, isn't it?  I have done something which I remember, and that remembrance says, be careful, don't let him discover that you told a lie because you have got a good reputation as an honest man, so protect yourself.  So, thinking and time are together.  There is no division between thought and time.  Please be clear on this matter, otherwise you will get rather confused later.  The causation of fear is time/thought, the root of it - right?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Are we clear on this thing that time, that is, the past, with all the things that one has done, and thought, whether pleasant or unpleasant, specially if it is unpleasant, is the root of fear?  This is an obvious fact.  A very simple verbal fact.  But to go behind the word and see the truth of this time/ thought, you will inevitably ask: how is thought to stop?  It is a natural question, no?  If thought creates fear, which is so obvious, then how am I to stop thinking?  `Please help me to stop my thinking.' I would be an ass to ask such a question but I am asking it.  How am I to stop thinking? Is that possible?  Go on, sir, investigate, don't let me go on. Thinking.  We live by thinking.  Everything we do is through thought. We went into that carefully the other day.  We won't waste time going into the cause, the beginning of thinking, how it comes - experience, knowledge, which is always limited, memory and then thought.  I am just briefly repeating it.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
So, is it possible to stop thinking?  Is it possible not to chatter all day long, to give the brain a rest, though it has its own rhythm, the blood going up to it, its own activity?  Its own, not the activity imposed by thought - you understand? May I point out, may the speaker point out, that that is a wrong question.  Who is it that stops thinking?  It is still thought, isn't it?  When I say, `If I could only stop thinking then I would have no fear', who is it that wishes to stop thought?  It is still thought, isn't it, because it wants something else?
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
So, what will you do?  Any movement of thought to be other than what it is, is still thinking.  I am greedy, but I must not be greedy - it is still thinking.  Thinking has put together all the paraphernalia, all that business that goes on in churches.  Like this tent it has been carefully put together by thought.  Apparently thought is the very root of our existence.  So we are asking a very serious question, seeing what thought has done, invented the most extraordinary things, the computer, the warships, the missiles, the atom bomb, surgery, medicine, and also the things it has made man do, go to the moon and so on.  Thought is the very root of fear.  Do we see that?  Not how to end thought, but see actually that thinking is the root of fear, which is time?  Seeing, not the words, but actually seeing.  When you have severe pain, the pain is not different from you and you act instantly - right?  So do you see as clearly as you see the clock, the speaker and your friend sitting beside you, that thought is the causation of fear?  Please don't ask: `How am I to see?' The moment you ask how, someone is willing to help you, then you become their slave.  But if you yourself see that thought/time are really the root of fear, it doesn't need deliberation or a decision.  A scorpion is poisonous, a snake is poisonous - at the very perception of them you act. So one asks, why don't we see?  Why don't we see that one of the causes of war is nationalities?  Why don't we see that one may be called a Muslim, and another a Christian - why do we fight over names, over propaganda?  Do we see it, or just memorize or think about it?  You understand, sirs, that your consciousness is the rest of mankind.  Mankind, like you and others, goes through every form of difficulty, pain, travail, anxiety, loneliness, depression, sorrow, pleasure - every human being goes through this - every human being all over the world.  So our consciousness, our being, is the entire humanity.  This is so.  How unwilling we are to accept such a simple fact, because we are so accustomed to individuality - I, me, first. But if you see that your consciousness is shared by all other human beings living on this marvellous earth then your whole way of living changes.  But you don't see that.  You need argument, you need lots of persuasion, pressure, propaganda, which are all so terribly useless because it is you that has to see this thing for yourself.
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
So, can we, each of us, who are the rest of mankind, who are mankind, look at a very simple fact?  Observe, see, that the causation of fear is thought/time?  Then the very perception is action.  And from that you don't rely on anybody.  The guru is like you.  The leader may put on different robes and all the jewels, but strip him of all that and he is just like you and me, only he has achieved greater power, and we also want greater power, money, position, status.  So could we look at all this, see it very clearly; then that very perception ends all this rubbish.  Then you are a free person. </DIV></TD></TR></TABLE></BODY></HTML>
